Sunday, March 17, 2013

That Bad Liberal Thing ...

Pushing an agenda under the guise of fairness or equality, is the way of Liberals. This is their glorification of bad behavior and blurring of the difference between right and wrong through legislation, namely, legalizing marijuana under the guise of medicine, taking Separation of Church and State too far except, in their efforts to redefine marriage, teaching sex and homosexuality in school under the guise of sex education etc. all while coarsening society in the process.

The trouble is, the poisonous seed of decadence always takes root on a slippery slope.

--Shylock (aka Hartley Atkins)

'A masterful work of poetry and prose. Reading his poetry just once won't do the trick ... it must be savored, again and again.' Available at Amazon

Friday, August 26, 2011

Mitt Romney Makes it Official – Campaign Kick-off in New Hampshire

“Barack Obama has failed America.”  This bold statement was the focal-point of former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney’s 20-minute speech in Stratham, New Hampshire on June 2nd.


"Today, we're united by our concern for America," Romney said. "Four years ago we gave someone new a chance to run the country. At the time we didn't know what kind of president he'd make ... Barack Obama has failed America."
In his address, Governor Romney stated that capping federal spending at 20 percent or less of the economy, balancing the budget and the total repeal of ObamaCare will top his agenda as president.
Romney is currently considered the GOP front-runner in this race.
For more information on Governor Romney, visit his campaign website athttp://www.mittromney.com/

The Republicans Open Fire


by Robert Arvay

Last night in New Hampshire, seven Republican presidential hopefuls participated in the first debate of the 2012 election season. Two big headlines stand out from this evening’s debate and both of them come from the Minnesota candidates.

1.  Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann is now a candidate. She announced that she has filed her papers as such.
2.  Governor Tim Pawlenty stated that Sarah Palin is qualified to be president.

First impressions:

1. Mitt Romney came across much stronger than I thought he would.
2.  Tim Pawlenty came across much weaker than I thought he would, but what he said about Sarah Palin made up for a lot.
3.  Herman Cain stumbled a couple of times, but what he lacks in polish, he makes up for with his plain-speaking manner and sincerity.
4.  Michelle Bachmann seems quick on her feet, solidly conservative, and defended the TEA Party well.
5.  Newt Gingrich is a no nonsense candidate. He will quickly point out the flaw in a question put to him, and then state his position.
6.  Ron Paul has very little charisma; I disagree with him on many points, but what he says is well worth hearing.
7.  Rick Santorum is a brilliant man, but could be more intense and engaged.

My pick from the seven:  Michelle Bachmann wins first place, Ron Paul seventh.

A side note: John King interspersed non-serious questions during the debate, which I think was a masterful touch that lightened the mood. The big question is why was liberal CNN hosting a Republican showcase event?

On the issue of abortion, I think that all the candidates flubbed this one. If we really wish to win the presidency, it is critical to have a position on abortion that most voters will support. My advice is to frame the contentious abortion issue on the Constitutional principle of due process, with which Americans instinctively agree.

The liberal philosophy on abortion is to kill any unborn baby, any time, at the mother's whim, at taxpayer expense; that should be portrayed as the radical position that it is. However, if we focus on due process, then we can say that an abortion can occur only if the unborn child has a voice, through an advocate: a fairness doctrine that really is fair.

In my opinion, a pregnant woman must prove that there is a threat to her life or her health, to the satisfaction of a panel of physicians, before killing the baby. She would also have to prove that there is no reasonable alternative to the abortion. That would eliminate the ability of the liberals to focus all the attention on the rare cases where an abortion might be excusable. Anyone who would deny the innocent child at least this modicum of respect would be cold hearted, indeed.

All seven of the candidates were solidly conservative on fiscal and Constitutional issues. Certainly any one of them would be a vast, vast improvement over Obama.

The most important point that everyone made is that Obama has deserted his post. He has no energy policy, no jobs program, no coherent foreign policy, no plan to save Medicare, and no responsible budget. Obama’s administration is a total disaster for this country.

Given time, it is possible that despite a rabidly anti-American propaganda machine loosely called “the reporters,” the candidates can begin to show the American people that the federal government needs desperately to return to its limited, Constitutional role or our liberties will be forfeit.

One might ask, aside from a brief mention, where was Sarah Palin in this debate? Why didn't she ask to be included? Since she chose to not participate, can she still be considered a possible candidate?

To answer that, I refer you back to the first debate among Republican candidates who ran in the year 2000. One man was notably absent. His name is George W Bush, later known as two-term President George W. Bush.

Monday, November 1, 2010

The Decline and Fall of the Middle Class

by John Wayne Tucker, www.theboldpursuit.com/jwts-journal

Since the beginning of recorded history, the vast majority of people have lived lives of desperate subsistence survival. All of the wealth of empires and eventual nations went to the powers that ran those empires. The massive wealth was always for the emperors, czars, kings and queens, dictators or whatever the leaders may have been called. In a few cases of empire, the citizens of the conquering peoples fared much better than everyone else in the known world, but still had significant limitations on wealth and property.

Most people have lived by making money for the owners of the land. The result for the worker was, hopefully, to make enough to eat at relatively regular intervals, to have some sort of minimal dwelling place, and to have the most rudimentary clothes.

Most people could truly expect to come into this world with nothing and leave with nothing.

Even at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, the fate of people was the same. They lived in worse conditions than their poor predecessors because they hovelled together in cities where they lived in ghetto-like conditions that were much more prone to the spread of disease and plagues than any who had come before them. This was true, not only of the British portion of the Industrial Revolution, but of the American portion as well.

Children had worked on the farms beside their parents and so it was not considered to be any different to send them off to a factory where they worked long hard hours, not for their parents, but for some unknown task master who expected them to work with very dangerous machinery or inside coal mines where the only education they ever got was to know the difference between coal and slag.

If you are a religious person, I suggest that you thank God that you were born in this time and not in any of those times. This is a unique time in history; the only time that a middle class society has developed in the true sense of the word. For the past hundred years, a growing middle class has pushed forward an economy and existence that supersedes the life-style of any of our forefathers.

During the past century, you could expect to have the opportunity to rise to a level of wealth that would allow you to own property, a home, personal property, conveniences, cars, an excess of food and even afford a somewhat leisurely life. Yes, life has never been better for the average person. We can get an education (even an advanced education is expected today), rise to middle management positions or even upper level management. We can afford to travel, play and enjoy the fruits of life.

In a way, it was the Industrialization process that made this possible. An Industrial America developed the need for managers and eventually a stable and happy work force. The ability of the work force to purchase the items they made led to an accelerating economy. Not only did we have markets abroad, but we had them at home as well. Thanks to factories and the assembly line approach to manufacturing, any person could qualify for a job if they wanted one. Things got better as time went along. Houses got bigger, cars got better, and wages continued to increase. There was actually money left over to save for the future. Retirement funds developed and the future was secured for everyone.

Sadly, we now are seeing the decline of the middle class.

During my lifetime, many of us have found that staying in the middle class has been something of a struggle. I would say that I have stayed there by “the skin of my teeth.” What has happened to bring us to the state of a shrinking middle class?

That is not a difficult question to answer. But there are many factors. Increasing inflation has been a significant factor and you can expect that problem to get much worse in the near future as trillion dollar debts come due. I like to use the example of a typical car to illustrate the inflation problem. All of the time that I have been living, the typical car cost about half a year’s salary but now with escalating prices (cars now costing on the average $30,000 and up) and declining salaries, it is common to see a car cost more than a year’s salary. Home prices escalated to amounts that the typical person could not even catch. Before I bought my present home, I tried to buy several other homes, but I could not get there fast enough to buy. Each time I tried, the cost had gone up another $30,000. Of course, we all know what a disaster that created.

But the single most destructive force behind the decline of the middle class to this point has been the loss of manufacturing jobs in America. We do not produce anything anymore. What we did produce has been outsourced all over the world to countries with cheap labor. While that may be good for the bottom line of a company in the short run, in the long run, it leaves a devastated home economy. If we cannot purchase the goods because we do not have jobs because we don’t make anything, how will the company’s profit?

Without jobs, the government assumes a more powerful role because now, they are expected to come in and fix the problem. But they attempt to fix the problem by throwing money at it. They want to assume control of your health care, your money (welfare) and eventually every aspect of life. But that sounds like the existence of all those people that lived before us; all of those people who came into this world with nothing and left with nothing.

Yes, it does, doesn’t it?

John Wayne Tucker
http://johnwaynetucker.com/congress

Monday, October 25, 2010

Bruce Brown, Candidate For U.S. Congress, Faces Maxine Waters On November 2nd

by Bruce Brown, candidate for U.S. Congress, CA
America will not be free until the people force their will on our government - just voting is not enough!

Stopping Maxine Waters is the place to start and EVERYONE must participate - it will take the will of the people.

Two independent research reports state Maxine Waters plundered as much as $17 million from the poor people of Haiti at the same time she says she was "helping" them in her public persona. The reports go on to say that she used OneUnited Bank to launder the funds, the same bank she says in response to her current ethics charges she has no relationship with, again "just helping minorities get on." For follow up, go to http://tinyurl.com/2498n38

But, the corruption is not my campaign, it is just why you need to help - our campaign is delivering the American Dream to the inner city and it is working at 70% conversion - that is right - minority Democrats are following me when they hear. And this is critical because until the RNCC understands that Democrats can be converted, they will keep playing political games instead of fighting for our freedom. My win will be "our win" for all America.

Maxine looks invincible because she has scarred off every serious opponent she has ever had for 20 years until now - but after two years volunteering in gang intervention, she did not scare me off but she scares the heck out of me with what she is doing to our country.

Please do everything you can to squeeze out one more donation. Thank you.

Bruce Brown
310 651 1816

PO Box 5306
Playa Del Rey, CA 90293

Friday, September 17, 2010

Opt for Integrity in Alaska... Joe Miller, U.S. Senate

"Ronald Reagan once said, “A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you've got.”  We have little time to restore constitutional limits on federal power.  I will be a catalyst to move those in Congress to make the tough, principled decisions needed to bring Washington back to the limited role anticipated by our Founders.  We must act now." Joe Miller, candidate for U.S. Senate, Alaska


http://joemiller.us/index2.php